Mining

Bitcoin developer Gavin Andresen suspects most cloud mining operations are Ponzi schemes

By Maria Santos

Last Updated: Jan 2, 2018

Gavin Andresen, the chief scientist at the Bitcoin Foundation and one of the most respected and well-known crypto-developers, recently made a very interesting statement about Bitcoin cloud mining, accusing most of these operations of being Ponzi schemes.

The statement, published on Reddit, almost went unnoticed, according to CryptoCoinsNews. Everything started when Redditor zapt0 asked the Bitcoin community their opinion about mining contracts. While most of the responses were  negative, Gavin’s reply was the most unexpected.

They make no sense. I suspect many of them [the Bitcoin cloud mining companies] will turn out to be Ponzi schemes.

Most people replying to the same question apparently share Gavin’s point of view or at least have a negative opinion regarding cloud mining contracts.

Mining contracts for the most part are a ripoff designed for the uninformed. Sad but true.

If it was more profitable to mine the people would not sell contracts, they would simply mine themselves. BTC mining contracts are a waste of time… Better to just buy BTC.

The fact is that several different types of fraud have happened before in the Bitcoin ecosystem. From investment scams to non-existent mining hardware manufacturers, a lot has already happened, so a Ponzi scheme would not be a complete surprise.

Of course, some Redditors still believe it is possible to make a profit with could mining contracts. “If you use the ones [contracts] on Cryptsy (MN1/MN2) or on CEX.IO, you can make money on those if you speculate on them. But as a long term investment, it is hard to even break even as you say. Even with the recent dip in hash rate increase”, the user kilorat wrote on Reddit.

CEX.IO is one of the most famous cloud mining companies, but not always for the best reasons. Although this was the trading platform that brought cloud mining to the masses, they also control the GHash.IO mining pool. The pool was recently involved in controversy for the second time in a year and for the same reasons: the possibility of a theoretical ’51% attack’ against the Bitcoin network.

Disclaimer Icon
Disclaimer
Crypto is a high-risk asset class. This article is provided for informational purposes and does not constitute investment advice. You could lose all of your capital.
99Bitcoins may receive advertising commissions for visits to a suggested operator through our affiliate links, at no added cost to you. All our recommendations follow a thorough review process.

Free Bitcoin Crash Course

  • Enjoyed by over 100,000 students.
  • One email a day, 7 days in a row.
  • Short and educational, guaranteed!

Why you can trust 99Bitcoins

10+ Years

Established in 2013, 99Bitcoin’s team members have been crypto experts since Bitcoin’s Early days.

90hr+

Weekly Research

100k+

Monthly readers

50+

Expert contributors

2000+

Crypto Projects Reviewed

Google News Icon
Follow 99Bitcoins on your Google News Feed
Get the latest updates, trends, and insights delivered straight to your fingertips. Subscribe now!
Subscribe now
Maria Santos
Maria Santos
Crypto Writer

Maria is an experienced journalist currently living in the UK. She has been writing about Bitcoin and the altcoin universe since 2013. She is also a member of the Lifeboat Foundation's New Money Systems Board and a big cryptocurrency supporter. Read More

Back to top