An easier way to receive emails through your Bitcoin address? Yes, please

B1txr is the name of the new service that allows Bitcoin users to use a cryptocurrency address to securely receive their emails, without a having to provide their real email address. All you have to do to is go to the service’s site and enter your Bitcoin address to create your new “email inbox”.


Although this is not the first or the only way to encrypt your email, the usual GPG/PGP encryption requires both sender and receiver to be using the same software, something that doesn’t happen all the time. And the same happens with Bitmessage.

That’s why B1txr is different and simpler, allowing users to privately receive emails. The website receives your emails and stores them for you. The safety of the service is guaranteed by asymmetric encryption: when you login, you’re required to prove that you own that specific Bitcoin address by signing a string of text provided by B1txr.

For now, B1txr – which is still being tested and has a limited storage capacity – announces that 97 emails were already received at 75 addresses. Since the project is still in the beginning, there’s no way to send emails from the service for now, but the future might bring new developments.


Bitcoin Video Crash Course 

Dummy-proof explainer videos enjoyed by over 100,000 students. One email a day for 7 days, short and educational, guaranteed.

We hate spam as much as you do. You can unsubscribe with one click.

newest oldest most voted
Notify of

I think you are confused about the purpose of this tool. > Although this is not the first or the only way to encrypt your email,… It does not encrypt your email. Any email sent to an address using this site are sent and stored and read in an unencrypted fashion. So unless you are using GPG/PGP or another tool, there is no encryption. What this tool DOES do is provide you with an instant email address associated with any bitcoin address that you own. You don’t need to pre-register to set up a password. Sort of like Mailinator, only… Read more »